[Bug 784175] Review Request: SuperLU - Subroutines to solve sparse linear systems
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 1 12:18:54 UTC 2012
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784175
--- Comment #4 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan at gmail.com> 2012-02-01 07:18:53 EST ---
I have updated:
* to use RPM_OPT_FLAGS and LIBS when building the sources
* to use Atlas library instead of blas
* Replaced names and version with their respective macros
SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/SuperLU.spec
SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/SuperLU-4.3-2.fc15.src.rpm
Successful Koji builds for F15, F16, F17 and EL6:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3751616
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3751621
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3751625
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3751623
$ rpmlint SuperLU.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint SuperLU-4.3-2.fc15.src.rpm
SuperLU.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US preordered -> reordered, p
reordered, prerecorded
SuperLU.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US preordering -> reordering,
p reordering, preordaining
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint SuperLU-4.3-2.fc15.x86_64.rpm
SuperLU.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US preordered ->
reordered, p reordered, prerecorded
SuperLU.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US preordering ->
reordering, p reordering, preordaining
SuperLU.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libsuperlu.so.4.3
exit at GLIBC_2.2.5
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
$ rpmlint SuperLU-devel-4.3-2.fc15.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list