[Bug 784944] Review Request: ktp-accounts-kcm - KDE Configuration Module for Telepathy Instant Messaging Accounts

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 7 03:19:32 UTC 2012


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784944

nucleo <alekcejk at googlemail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |alekcejk at googlemail.com
          QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |alekcejk at googlemail.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #1 from nucleo <alekcejk at googlemail.com> 2012-02-06 22:19:22 EST ---
name: ok
summary: ok
license: ok
handling locale files: ok
Obsoletes/Provides: ok

BuildRequires: telepathy-qt4-deve not needed because ktp-common-internals-devel
requires it.


"rm -f %{buildroot}%{_kde4_libdir}/libkcmtelepathyaccounts.so" is actually not
removes anything. Maybe it should be "rm -f %{buildroot}%{_kde4_libdir}/
libktpaccountskcminternal.so" and remove
%{_kde4_libdir}/libktpaccountskcminternal.so?

ldd shows that libs installed in kde4 requires only versioned
libktpaccountskcminternal.so.4.

This will fix rpmlint warning:
ktp-accounts-kcm.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/libktpaccountskcminternal.so

More detailed description can be added from README.
There are many protocol dependencies:
Requires: telepathy-butterfly
Requires: telepathy-gabble
Requires: telepathy-haze
Requires: telepathy-idle
Requires: telepathy-rakia
Requires: telepathy-salut
Requires: telepathy-sunshine

So maybe it makes sense to place every protocol in subpackage with
corresponding dependency?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list