[Bug 787713] Review request: free-solid
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 7 08:44:49 UTC 2012
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713
--- Comment #4 from MartinKG <mgansser at alice.de> 2012-02-07 03:44:48 EST ---
Thanks for remarks!
>Contrary to what README, license is noted as LGPLv2+, see licensecheck -r
><some_dir>.
[ see comment #3]
So: we agree that License: GPLv2 is OK?!
>I think the devel sub-package has to require pkgconfig, but I can't
find that
>in the rules right now.
You are certainly right. The .pc file lives in /usr/lib{64}/pkgconfig,
owned by pkgconfig. Fixed.
>The devel package needs %{?_isa}, see
>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package
Oops... Fixed.
>I suggest to use the name macro in the files section as well, as
you're using
>it in other places.
Fixed.
>You might want to include the sample dir as documentation to the devel
package.
Fixed.
>The build fails for me on F16 x86_64:
>...
>+ autoreconf -i
[cut]
This is strange. Both the old and the new srpm builds (built) on mock,
f15-x86_64 and f16-x86_64. The new also builds on koji, f16. What's
going on?
Also fixed the source URL, which just was wrong.
New srpm at:
https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/free-solid/free-solid-2.1.1-2.fc16.src.rpm?a=ViKFwcxqtho
New rpm spec at:
https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/free-solid/free-solid-2.1.1-2.fc16.src.rpm?a=ViKFwcxqtho
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list