[Bug 787713] Review request: free-solid

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 7 08:44:49 UTC 2012


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713

--- Comment #4 from MartinKG <mgansser at alice.de> 2012-02-07 03:44:48 EST ---
Thanks for remarks!

 >Contrary to what README, license is noted as LGPLv2+, see licensecheck -r
 ><some_dir>.
[ see comment #3]
So: we agree that License: GPLv2  is OK?!

 >I think the devel sub-package has to require pkgconfig, but I can't
find that
 >in the rules right now.
You are certainly right.  The .pc file lives in /usr/lib{64}/pkgconfig,
owned by pkgconfig. Fixed.

 >The devel package needs %{?_isa}, see
 >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package
Oops... Fixed.

 >I suggest to use the name macro in the files section as well, as
you're using
 >it in other places.
Fixed.

 >You might want to include the sample dir as documentation to the devel
package.
Fixed.

 >The build fails for me on F16 x86_64:
 >...
 >+ autoreconf -i
[cut]
This is strange. Both the old and the new srpm builds (built) on mock,
f15-x86_64 and f16-x86_64. The new also builds on koji, f16.  What's
going on?

Also fixed the source URL, which just was wrong.

New srpm at:
https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/free-solid/free-solid-2.1.1-2.fc16.src.rpm?a=ViKFwcxqtho
New rpm spec at:
https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/free-solid/free-solid-2.1.1-2.fc16.src.rpm?a=ViKFwcxqtho

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list