[Bug 788252] Review Request: python-sendfile - Python interface to the sendfile(2) system call

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788252

Ian Weller <ian at ianweller.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ian at ianweller.org

--- Comment #1 from Ian Weller <ian at ianweller.org> 2012-02-08 00:29:33 EST ---
A quick note -- the upstream project name is pysendfile, not sendfile or
python-sendfile, and because the upstream project name has "py" in it, this
package's base name should be pysendfile.

>From the naming guidelines: "When naming a package, the name should match the
upstream tarball or project name from which this software came."

Also from the naming guidelines: "There is an exception to this rule. If the
upstream source has "py" (or "Py") in its name, you can use that name for the
package. So, for example, pygtk is acceptable." (the "rule" in context is using
python-$modulename)

I have a feeling this can be argued either way but I'm leaning towards
pysendfile.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.