[Bug 616292] Review Request: pekwm-themes - Pekwm themes collection

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 14 10:14:30 UTC 2012


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616292

--- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert <cwickert at fedoraproject.org> 2012-02-14 05:14:28 EST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Hi, if you check all the "theme" files, they all contain "License: GPL":
> 
> % grep -r License pekwm-themes/
> pekwm-themes/clearlooks/theme:# License: GPL
> pekwm-themes/ubuntu_human/theme:# License: GPL
> pekwm-themes/leopard/theme:# License: GPL
> pekwm-themes/default-blue/theme:# License: GPL
> pekwm-themes/tango/theme:# License: GPL
> pekwm-themes/kde4_oxygen/theme:# License: GPL
> pekwm-themes/nimbus/theme:# License: GPL
> pekwm-themes/gilouche/theme:# License: GPL
> pekwm-themes/default-brown/theme:# License: GPL
> pekwm-themes/dust/theme:# License: GPL
> pekwm-themes/kde4/theme:# License: GPL
> pekwm-themes/default-nice/theme:# License: GPL
> pekwm-themes/vista_black/theme:# License: GPL

This means two themes (tigris and xfce4) lack a license header. And the ones
that have one all refer to http://adrinux.wordpress.com which no longer exists.

> Also, pekwm-themes has just been moved from AUR (unsupported) to [community]
> (official) in Arch Linux, as GPL.

"GPL" is not a valid license for Fedora. We need to know what version it is
(GPLv2 or GPLv3) and whether is it that version only or "any later version"
(GPLv2+ or GPLv3+).

How does Arch deal with this? Do they distribute content with unclear
licensing?

In order to have this package in Fedora, we need to
- know the exact licenses of the themes
- have a valid upstream URL
- have a valid source URL, either for the all-in-one tarball for the individual
themes
- know the name of the author

Last but not we usually don't package dead software. I know things are
different for noarch content that is not going to change, but still I'd feel
much more comfortable if I knew we had an active upstream.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list