[Bug 790525] Review Request: rubygem-dynect_rest - Dynect REST API library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 15 18:02:20 UTC 2012
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790525
John (J5) Palmieri <johnp at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from John (J5) Palmieri <johnp at redhat.com> 2012-02-15 13:02:19 EST ---
Here are the ruby specific reviews, I'll go over the general package review
next:
* The Source of the package must be the full URL to the released Gem archive;
the version of the package must be the Gem's version
Pass
* The package must have a Requires and a BuildRequires on rubygems
Pass
* The package must provide rubygem(%{gemname}) where gemname is the name from
the Gem's specification. For every dependency on a Gem named gemdep, the
package must contain a Requires on rubygem(%{gemdep}) with the same version
constraints as the Gem
Pass
* The %prep and %build sections of the specfile should be empty.
Pass
* The Gem must be installed into %{gemdir} defined as
%global gemdir %(ruby -rubygems -e 'puts Gem::dir' 2>/dev/null)
Pass
* The install should be performed with the command
gem install --local --install-dir %{buildroot}%{gemdir} --force %{SOURCE0}
Fail - please fix the cp lines to use gem install or justify why gem install
does not work
* The package must own the following files and directories:
%{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/
%{gemdir}/cache/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem
%{gemdir}/specifications/%{gemname}-%{version}.gemspec
Fail - you exclude %{gemdir}/cache/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem
* If the Gem only contains pure Ruby code, it must be marked as BuildArch:
noarch.
Pass
Please fix all the MUST items. Fix or justify why we should wave the SHOULD
items.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list