[Bug 789386] Review Request: lilv - An LV2 Resource Description Framework Library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Feb 26 03:51:22 UTC 2012
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789386
Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2012-02-25 22:51:21 EST ---
I started reviewing this one. Here are my initial findings:
! The specfile in th link above does not match the specfile that comes inside
the SRPM. I started the review with the latter.
* Missing BR: lv2core-devel sord-devel (You BR sord instead, which is
insufficient). I suggest using mock which will tell you the BRs you need to
add.
* The directory /etc/bash_completion.d/ remains unowned. We can either own this
directory, or add Requires: bash_completion. But looking at the multiple owners
of the directory /etc/bash_completion.d/ I can say that we should also own this
directory.
* You can pass "--bindings" to "./waf configure" to build the Python bindings.
Note that you will then also need BR: swig python-devel (Just BR: python is not
sufficient)
* Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored. You will need to export
CFLAGS instead, as the source is written in C.
! Since you build the unit test via --test, you should probably run the test in
%check.
* %{_mandir}/man1/* should go into the main package, as these are manpages for
stuff that goes to /usr/bin.
* License tag should be MIT.
! Buildroot tag is no longer required. Does no harm though.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list