[Bug 722205] Review Request: calligra-l10n - Language files for calligra

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 29 14:21:57 UTC 2012


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722205

Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik at redhat.com> 2012-02-29 09:21:55 EST ---
Name: ok
Summary: ok (but make Calligra upper-case as it's a name)
Version & release: ok
License: ok, GPLv2+, same as main Calligra package (Required)
URL: ok
Sources: ok (but use stable/unstable snippet)
BuildRequires: ok
Obsoletes: ok
 for subpackages: ok
Requires: ok
Description: ok
 for subpackages: ok (just fix s/calligra/Calligra)
Macros used consistently: ok

rpmlint output
calligra-l10n.src:514: E: use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR
used to unpack the tarball, ok

Otherwise it's quite simple package, please, fix the small issues (not a
blocker ones).

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list