[Bug 768174] Review Request: srm-ifce - Storage Resources Manager client implementation

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768174

--- Comment #13 from Mohamed El Morabity <pikachu.2014 at gmail.com> 2012-01-04 11:19:35 EST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> I believe the following files should be marked as %doc:
> %{_docdir}/srm-ifce/LICENSE
> %{_docdir}/srm-ifce/RELEASE-NOTES
> %{_docdir}/srm-ifce/VERSION
It's useless since any file installed in %{_docdir} is automatically tagged as
%doc.

By the way, documentation files are usually installed in
%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} (this is where the %doc macro installs standalone
documentation files), even if it's not mandatory (there is no explicit
guidelines about this).
Is there anyway a way to set through cmake the installation path of
documentation?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.