[Bug 760294] Review Request: freexl - Library to extract data from within an Excel spreadsheet

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760294

--- Comment #4 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069 at gmail.com> 2012-01-08 10:20:05 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I just took the version number as upstream put it: 1.0.0a
> 
> As far as I get it, this is the way to go:
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Non-Numeric_Version_in_Release
> 
> Please correct me, if I'm wrong!

The guidelines could be more clear here. This is definitely a post-release
package so we need to start there[1], however, in that section of the
guidelines it goes back to showing examples of the progression from
pre-release, release, and then post-release.

The first post-release examples is:
foo-1.1.0-2.GA1 (post release, GA1)

Of course this one starts at Release "2" because the "1" was used by the
initial release of the package. Since this package didn't exist in Fedora yet
it would start at "1"

[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages


(In reply to comment #3)
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages
> 
> I think you're right! A 1.0.0b was released on the 29th of December. It is not
> on the frontpage though.
> 
> http://www.gaia-gis.it/FreeXL/freexl-sources/
> 
> If the schema is kept like this, I can put that all in "Version".

No, I think the "b" still goes in the release field.

Richard

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.