[Bug 772233] Review Request: mstflint - Mellanox firmware burning utility

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772233

Albert Strasheim <fullung at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fullung at gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Albert Strasheim <fullung at gmail.com> 2012-01-09 08:18:58 EST ---
$ rpmlint mstflint.spec mstflint-1.4-6.fc15.x86_64.rpm
mstflint.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Mellanox -> Melanoma
mstflint.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided openib-mstflint
mstflint.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided openib-tvflash
mstflint.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided tvflash
mstflint.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mstmread
mstflint.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mstflint
mstflint.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mstvpd
mstflint.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mstregdump
mstflint.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mstmwrite
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.

How does mstflint relate to the mft packages provided by Mellanox?

http://www.mellanox.com/content/pages.php?pg=management_tools&menu_section=34

For some reason I got the idea that mstflint is older software, but I could
easily be mistaken.

Is it worth packaging this for Fedora?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.