[Bug 605290] Review Request: transmageddon - A video transcoder built using GStreamer
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jan 12 13:12:26 UTC 2012
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605290
Mario Santagiuliana <fedora at marionline.it> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fedora at marionline.it
--- Comment #6 from Mario Santagiuliana <fedora at marionline.it> 2012-01-12 08:12:16 EST ---
I am still learning how to became a reviewer so I just give you an unofficial
review.
Package Review
==============
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
==== Generic ====
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported architecture.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: defattr(....) present in %files -f %{name}.lang section. This is OK
if packaging for EPEL5. Otherwise not needed
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop using desktop-
file-install file if it is a GUI application.
[?]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[!]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST The spec file handles locales properly.
[?]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[?]: MUST Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generates any conflict.
[?]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[?]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[?]: MUST Package installs properly.
[-]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint transmageddon-0.16-2.fc17.noarch.rpm
transmageddon.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) transcoder -> trans
coder, trans-coder, transponder
transmageddon.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcoder ->
trans coder, trans-coder, transponder
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
rpmlint transmageddon-0.16-2.fc17.src.rpm
transmageddon.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) transcoder -> trans coder,
trans-coder, transponder
transmageddon.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcoder -> trans
coder, trans-coder, transponder
transmageddon.src:38: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
transmageddon.src:38: W: macro-in-comment %{_bindir}
transmageddon.src:39: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
transmageddon.src:39: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
transmageddon.src:40: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
transmageddon.src:40: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
transmageddon.src:41: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
transmageddon.src:41: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
transmageddon.src:42: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
transmageddon.src:42: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
transmageddon.src:43: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
transmageddon.src:43: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
transmageddon.src:44: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
transmageddon.src:44: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
transmageddon.src:44: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
transmageddon.src:45: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
transmageddon.src:45: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
transmageddon.src:45: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
transmageddon.src:46: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
transmageddon.src:46: W: macro-in-comment %{_mandir}
transmageddon.src:51: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab:
line 51)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 23 warnings.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
/home/makerpm/605290/transmageddon-0.16.tar.bz2 :
MD5SUM this package : 11d530878d7fec48c1bdd3221a194464
MD5SUM upstream package : 11d530878d7fec48c1bdd3221a194464
[?]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[!]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
I think you could use %{?dist}
[?]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[?]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[?]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
upstream.
[x]: SHOULD Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[!]: SHOULD SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
Note: Patch0: desktop_entry.patch (desktop_entry.patch)
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[?]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[?]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.
Issues:
[!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: defattr(....) present in %files -f %{name}.lang section. This is OK
if packaging for EPEL5. Otherwise not needed
[!]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
The spec file inside tarball specify LGPLv2+ license, you specify GPLv2+,
the license should be LGPLv2+.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint transmageddon-0.16-2.fc17.noarch.rpm
transmageddon.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) transcoder -> trans
coder, trans-coder, transponder
transmageddon.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcoder ->
trans coder, trans-coder, transponder
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
rpmlint transmageddon-0.16-2.fc17.src.rpm
transmageddon.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) transcoder -> trans coder,
trans-coder, transponder
transmageddon.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcoder -> trans
coder, trans-coder, transponder
transmageddon.src:38: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
transmageddon.src:38: W: macro-in-comment %{_bindir}
transmageddon.src:39: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
transmageddon.src:39: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
transmageddon.src:40: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
transmageddon.src:40: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
transmageddon.src:41: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
transmageddon.src:41: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
transmageddon.src:42: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
transmageddon.src:42: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
transmageddon.src:43: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
transmageddon.src:43: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
transmageddon.src:44: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
transmageddon.src:44: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
transmageddon.src:44: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
transmageddon.src:45: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
transmageddon.src:45: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
transmageddon.src:45: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
transmageddon.src:46: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
transmageddon.src:46: W: macro-in-comment %{_mandir}
transmageddon.src:51: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab:
line 51)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 23 warnings.
[!]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
I think you could use %{?dist}
[!]: SHOULD SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
Note: Patch0: desktop_entry.patch (desktop_entry.patch)
Generated by fedora-review 0.1.1
There is a new version of transmageddon 0.20, you could update your package :)
Thank you
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list