[Bug 551765] Review Request: prosody - Flexible communications server for Jabber/XMPP

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Mar 7 00:27:42 UTC 2012


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765

Johan Cwiklinski <johan at x-tnd.be> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW

--- Comment #25 from Johan Cwiklinski <johan at x-tnd.be> 2012-03-06 19:27:38 EST ---
I've made a new version of the package:

Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/prosody/prosody.spec
SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/prosody/prosody-0.8.2-2.fc16.src.rpm

The main change is systemd integration for Fedora. It should also work on EL-6.
Mock builds fine (tested on F-16/x86_64 and EL-6/X86_64).

rpmlint is still not clean :
prosody.src:40: W: configure-without-libdir-spec

This one should be ok since upstream does not use autotools but a specific
configure script ; which does not provide any '--libdir' flag.

prosody.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/prosody prosody
prosody.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/prosody prosody
prosody.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/prosody prosody
prosody.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/prosody prosody
prosody.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary prosody

non-standard uid/gid are ok because the package creates it own user for the
daemon to run.

no-manual-page: well.. there is no manual page. I guess that is OK as well.

On EL only:
prosody.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/prosody $prog

incoherent-subsys is due to the use of '$prog' in the initd file.

lua-expat and lua-socket are now available on EL-6 as well, so missing
dependencies are now lua-sec (approved today - bz #551763) and lua-dbi (bz
#707016).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list