[Bug 800930] New: Review Request: redeclipse - Multiplayer FPS game based on Cube2
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Mar 7 14:14:52 UTC 2012
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: redeclipse - Multiplayer FPS game based on Cube2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800930
Summary: Review Request: redeclipse - Multiplayer FPS game
based on Cube2
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: martinerikwerner at gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com,
package-review at lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Spec URL: http://arand.fedorapeople.org/redeclipse.spec
SRPM URL: http://arand.fedorapeople.org/redeclipse-1.2-1.fc17.src.rpm
(mind, ~0.5G)
Description:
Red Eclipse is an actively developed FPS game based on the cube2 engine (of
Sauerbraten fame). One of the main developers of sauerbraten are the
co-main-developer of RE.
Red Eclipse is currently packaged for Debian (by me), and I figured it would be
nice to package it for Fedora as well.
Some comments and questions:
1. Enet 1.3 is not yet in Fedora, I don't intent to upload RE before it is,
however I wanted to have the package reviewed still so that other issues may be
fixed in the meantime.
2. I am using my own debian packaging (metatdata) tarballs as Source#s both for
the exhaustive copyright info, and for patches. Is this ok? should I be
separating those files out as Source#s and Patch#s instead?
3. I am ignoring some rpmlint spelling errors in the Summary and description.
How important is spelling vs common usage in this case?
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list