[Bug 801014] New: Rename request: mingw32-plotmm -> mingw-plotmm

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Mar 7 14:29:24 UTC 2012


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Rename request: mingw32-plotmm -> mingw-plotmm

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801014

           Summary: Rename request: mingw32-plotmm -> mingw-plotmm
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: Unspecified
        OS/Version: Unspecified
            Status: ASSIGNED
          Severity: unspecified
          Priority: unspecified
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl
        ReportedBy: erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com,
                    package-review at lists.fedoraproject.org
    Classification: Fedora
      Story Points: ---
              Type: ---
        Regression: ---
        Mount Type: ---
     Documentation: ---


Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs?

This request is part of the plan to rename all mingw32-* packages to mingw-* as
part of the new MinGW packaging guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW_Future#Package_naming

At the FESCO meeting of March 5 2012 an exception was granted to allow this
rename without requiring a re-review: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/812

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: mingw-plotmm
Short Description: MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications
Owners: sailer rjones
Branches: f17
InitialCC: epienbro

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list