[Bug 769919] Review Request: hydra - Very fast network log-on cracker

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Mar 8 19:48:05 UTC 2012


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769919

--- Comment #12 from Athmane Madjoudj <athmanem at gmail.com> 2012-03-08 14:48:04 EST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Hm, I don't feel very happy about having to install PostgreSQL and Firebird
> libraries, just to be able to use this program for SVN, for instance.
> 

It's a multi-protocols brute-forcer, there's a similar package in fedora
'medusa', packaged in the same way even if it has a modular architecture (.so
for each service, but the package depends on libssh2, postgresql libs etc...),
hydra is on binary :/.


> There is at least some GPLv3+ code. Have you dug through the code? It is quite
> a mixture, but I assume GPLv3+ as the overall license could be fine.
> 

It seems to be 'GPLv3 with exceptions' (because of OpenSSL), I checked with
Gentoo (GPL-3) and Debian (GPL-3.0+ with OpenSSL exception)

> Please preserve the timestamps for the manpages and the icon (-p).
> 

Fixed in -4

> What is the group "X-Red-Hat-Base" for?
> 

Removed in -4, 

> There are several format warnings when you compile the code. Try to fix them
> and submit it to upstream.
> 

I noticed them when I enabled CFLAGS, I'm using this build at work and it seems
very stable (heavily tested with SSH and FTP), but I'll try to help upstream to
fix them (along with mysql and CFLAGS support)

> On my F16 64 bit system a build with rpmbuild fails for some reason, while it
> works with Mock.

Maybe you have mysql-devel, can attach the errors


SPEC: http://athmane.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hydra.spec
SRPM: http://athmane.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hydra-7.2-4.fc16.src.rpm
Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3870495

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list