[Bug 802161] Review Request: mingw-w64-tools - Supplementary tools which are part of the mingw-w64 toolchain

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802161

--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz <ktietz at redhat.com> 2012-03-14 17:33:36 EDT ---

[ktietz at nike fd_mingw]$ rpmlint mingw-w64-tools.spec -i
(none): E: no installed packages by name -i
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

[ktietz at nike fd_mingw]$ rpmlint 
mingw-w64-tools-2.0.999-0.2.trunk.20120124.fc16.src.rpm 
mingw-w64-tools.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) toolchain -> tool chain,
tool-chain, touchline
mingw-w64-tools.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US toolchain -> tool
chain, tool-chain, touchline
mingw-w64-tools.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gendef -> gender,
gen def, gen-def
mingw-w64-tools.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US genidl -> genial
mingw-w64-tools.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US widl -> wild,
wide, will
mingw-w64-tools.src: W: file-size-mismatch mingw-w64-src_20120124.tar.bz2 =
104449518,
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchain%20sources/Automated%20Builds/mingw-w64-src_20120124.tar.bz2
= 33334
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.

Not sure here about those spelling-errors.  They look bogus to me, but the
archive-file-size difference looks to me a bit more concerning.

Also, wouldn't it be better to prefix gendef/genidl by mingw-w64- prefix (as
done for widl), too?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.