[Bug 804755] New: Review Request: Factor - A stack-based programming language
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Mar 19 18:25:29 UTC 2012
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: Factor - A stack-based programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804755
Summary: Review Request: Factor - A stack-based programming
language
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: codeblock at elrod.me
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com,
package-review at lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Spec URL: http://codeblock.fedorapeople.org/packages/factor/factor.spec
SRPM URL:
http://codeblock.fedorapeople.org/packages/factor/factor-0.94-1.fc18.src.rpm
Description: A stack-based programming language
notes:
1) Factor bootstraps against itself using a premade 'image'.
I have a FPC ticket open for an exemption here:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/155 but was told to file the review request
anyway.
2) 'factor', the name, conflicts with a Coreutils tool of the same name.
Because of this, the binary gets installed as 'factor-vm'
rpmlint outputs:
[ricky at t520 SPECS]$ rpmlint factor.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[ricky at t520 SPECS]$ rpmlint factor
factor.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/factor/extra/elf/a.elf
factor.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary factor-vm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
[ricky at t520 SRPMS]$ rpmlint factor-0.94-1.fc18.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list