[Bug 790628] Review Request: Adobe Source Libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Mar 19 18:38:46 UTC 2012


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628

--- Comment #29 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec at gmail.com> 2012-03-19 14:38:43 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> It is much better now.

Yup. Thanks to you 

[cut]

>   adobe-source-libraries-doc.x86_64: E: zero-length
> /usr/share/doc/adobe-source-libraries-doc-1.0.43/documentation/performance/index.html
>     > Please query upstream about this file, also nice to have: [ -s
> documentation/performance/index.html ] || rm -f
> documentation/performance/index.html

Fixed, link in spec.

> [?]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
>   It seems not to be against the guidelines, but the changelog from example
> differs:
>   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs
>   So I would prefer not using the space indentation for version-release suffix
> and also not inserting VIM metadata in the end of SPEC file (# vim:
> tabstop=4:expandtab).

It's just kind of a habit, and the two other packages I own have this layout.
They where reviewed by my sponsor, and he accepted as soon he understood it was
on purpose. But if you insist, I will of course remove the whitespace. The vim
metadata is removed

> [!]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
>      names).
>   $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is used, according to other vars/macros usage %{buildroot}
> should be used instead.

Fixed

> [!]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
[cut]
>   Please use sourceforge URL as noted in:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.net

Fixed. The reference URL doesn't work, I tried to stay as close as possible.

> [!]: SHOULD SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
[cut]
> Not blocker, nice to have.

and prefixing w adobe-source-libraries instead of asl would give insanely long
names...

> 
> Other:
> For adobe-source-libraries-doc package, I would rather see the doc in
> /usr/share/doc/adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43 directory instead of
> /usr/share/doc/adobe-source-libraries-doc-1.0.43

Yet another good spot. Fixed.

New links:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17870887/adobe-7/adobe-source-libraries.spec
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17870887/adobe-7/adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-7.fc16.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list