[Bug 739014] Review Request: erlang-lager - A logging framework for Erlang/OTP

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon May 21 19:51:17 UTC 2012


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739014

Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Whiteboard|NotReady                    |

--- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> ---
Ver. 1.0.0 (and cleaned up NotReady flag):

* http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-lager.spec
* http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-lager-1.0.0-1.fc18.src.rpm

Koji scratchbuild for F-18:
* http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4092462

rpmlint:
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../SRPMS/erlang-lager-1.0.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
../RPMS/ppc/erlang-lager-1.0.0-1.fc18.ppc.rpm 
erlang-lager.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US logrotate -> log
rotate, log-rotate, rotate
erlang-lager.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US syslog -> slog

^^^ false positives.

erlang-lager.src: W: invalid-url Source0: basho-lager-1.0.0-0-g09ecad6.tar.gz

^^^ blame GitHub for that.

erlang-lager.ppc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US logrotate -> log
rotate, log-rotate, rotate
erlang-lager.ppc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US syslog -> slog

^^^ false positives.

erlang-lager.ppc: E: no-binary
erlang-lager.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib

^^^ this one is tricky. All erlang packages must be installed into
%{_libdir}/erlang/lib so despite of the fact that some of them contains only
arch-independent data they all must be build as arch-dependent. I plan to fix
thaŠµ but I wouldn't hold my breath.

2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-review/attachments/20120521/bf2ba444/attachment.html>


More information about the package-review mailing list