[Fedora-packaging] RFC: howto to package LaTeX classes

José Pedro Oliveira jpo at di.uminho.pt
Sun Feb 27 00:29:07 UTC 2005


Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 19:50 +0000, José Pedro Oliveira wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Are there any recommendations regarding TeTeX packages?
>>
>>In particular I have a few doubts/questions regarding:
>>
>>  * license
>>
>>    Question:
>>    Is the "LaTeX Project Public License" an approved license?
>
>
> It's not an OSI approved license, but it is listed as a
> "GPL-Incompatible, Free Software License".
>
> I've updated the PackagingGuidelines with regards to licensing.
> Basically, if its a OSI-approved license, "GPL-Compatible, Free Software
> License", or "GPL-Incompatible, Free Software License", its ok for
> Fedora Extras.
>
> Thus, the LPPL is ok.
>

Thanks for the information.

jpo
--
José Pedro Oliveira
* mailto: jpo at di.uminho.pt * http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/~jpo *
* gpg fingerprint = F9B6 8D87 859D 1C94 48F0 84C0 9749 9EB5 91BD 851B *
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20050227/fa77d7c8/attachment.bin 


More information about the packaging mailing list