[Fedora-packaging] Some packaging guidelines suggestions
Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Sun Oct 9 10:10:45 UTC 2005
Hi,
As Fedora Extras is speeding up we're starting to see people unearthing
their pet package from RHL 6.x/7.x time and submitting it to extras. It
may be a good idea to add those §s to the packaging guidelines :
1. Red Hat packaging is not always right
FE has stronger packaging requirements than RHL/RHEL/FC, so blindly
copying a RHL/RHEL/FC spec file may not be sufficient (especially if you
rebase older releases).
2. Follow the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard
Always follow the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard rules when choosing file
locations. The FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) is one standard
everyone seems to agree on.
--
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20051009/be23c585/attachment.bin
More information about the packaging
mailing list