[Fedora-packaging] Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws

[Ville Skyttä]

On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 18:34 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:

> Until now I'm fighting the uname-r-in-name and one-specfile battles, I
> really don't want to distract people from these issues until they are
> done with.

debuginfos are intimately part of that "battle".  It's not a
distraction, it's required information.

> To answer your question on debuginfos: You simply change the name of
> the debuginfo package

In the specfile?  How?  Examples?  Surely you're not suggesting to just
rename the actual debuginfo rpm file on disk after it has been built and
be happy?

> > As discussed previously in private mail, if you don't have time to
> > document something, just upload a few example packages built for let's
> > say two successive FC kernels (complete with SRPMS, macro definitions,
> > binaries and debuginfos) somewhere and post a link to that somewhere in
> > public.
> 
> You mean like http://ATrpms.net/?

I have no idea where to find the macro definitions and debuginfo
packages for your suggested scheme there.