[Fedora-packaging] Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws

[Panu Matilainen]

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, seth vidal wrote:

> On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 08:08 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
>> Now, I don't really want to take any sides in this, I just want the dang
>> thing to be decided one way or the other so we can move on to refining our
>> plugins, as plugins are required in both schemes to be correctly handled
>> in all cases. From experience I know the unamer-in-name works quite nicely
>> but has it quirks from user POV [1], OTOH the kmod scheme (currently used
>> by livna) also seems to work just fine, at least it hasn't bitten me yet
>> although I haven't used any plugins to handle it.
>
> +1
>
> I was not taking a side in it. I was just explaining about what has
> worked about the kmod scheme in the past.

Yup, that's the way at least I read it.

> I'd just like one or the other, ultimately, please, for the love of all
> that's good and holy. :)

Amen! :)

 	- Panu -