[Fedora-packaging] Re: kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...)

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Fri Aug 18 12:55:18 UTC 2006


On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 01:30:06PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> 
> 
> Axel Thimm schrieb:
> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:54:06PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >>
> >> Axel Thimm schrieb:
> >>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 01:11:57PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 13:36 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> >>> And to cut to the chase: Ever tried to support special kernel rpms
> >>> like swsusp2 or ccrma's low-latency kernels? I did and know it works
> >>> for kmdl and will fail with kmod.
> >> I looked into this once and I'd like to give people a bit more
> >> background from my point of view:
> >>
> >> Yes, kmod fails for the swsusp2 kernel from http://mhensler.de/swsusp/.
> >> But that's not directly a bug/problem in kmod. kmods would work if the
> >> swsusp2 kernel would be packaged exactly in the same way as the FC
> >> kernels are packaged. But that's not the case.
> > 
> > which was done deliberately to not conflict with having the same name
> > with a Fedora package, just as the highest mandate coming from Fedora
> > to 3rd parties is, right?
> 
> Right, but it can be done in different ways, e.g. in a ways, that
> follows the general naming and file-placing behavior from the Fedora
> kernels or in ways that differ -- in case of the swsusp the latter was
> chosen.

Just outline a way that custom kernel packages could be created
Fedora-conform and be supported by kmods, because I just stated in the
mail you replied to, that this is impossible:

 If you follow Fedora compliance you lose kmod support, if you
 follow kmod compliance you lose Fedora compliance.

I also showed real life examples for all cases.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20060818/eae4ac50/attachment.bin 


More information about the packaging mailing list