[Fedora-packaging] Python submodule naming

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:10 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 12:36 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > In this case:
> > 
> >   import paste.deploy
> >   import paste.script
> > 
> > This could reasonably be named python-pastedeploy or
> > python-paste-deploy.  Do we want to specify that submodules be named one
> > or the other or leave it up to the packager?
> > 
> > For what it's worth, Debian has python-pastedeploy but also
> > python-twisted-conch so they seem to leave it to the packager ATM.
> 
> Up to developer's discretion, IMHO. Look at what upstream calls it.

Sounds good to me.  If no one objects today, I'll post that to the bugs
which are waiting for clarification (as this isn't a Guideline change
AFAIS).

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20060818/9e2f92dd/attachment.bin