[Fedora-packaging] Re: Absolute symlinks

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Tue Aug 22 15:10:44 UTC 2006


On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:04:16AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Here's rpmlint's reasoning: 
>   'Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot
> environments.'

In that sense every symlink is danergerous including relative ones: if
it contains too many ".." you'll end up outside the chroot anyway if
accessed from outside. If accessed from inside the chroot, absolute
paths are even securer when being root.

Chroots (with external access, e.g. not within) aren't used by package
consumers, but package builders and testers.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20060822/5de95450/attachment.bin 


More information about the packaging mailing list