[Fedora-packaging] Re: Should packages really own their config files???

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Tue Sep 5 02:48:15 UTC 2006


On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 22:41 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> anaconda is very unlikely to be on the system.

Good point.  Lets focus on whether or not this file is really needed...

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20060904/f42f8683/attachment.bin 


More information about the packaging mailing list