[Fedora-packaging] Re: Unadressed bugs as part of reviews

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 08:19 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> 
> > I saw this set of comments in a merge review and it struck me as a
> > little off:
> >   > 5. There are outstanding bugs for [pkg] please address them.
> >   This is not relevant to the packaging review process.
> 
> As stated, I agree, it's just too vague.
> 
> What is relevant, however, are reviewers mentioning *specific*
> current/outstanding issues/bugs that ought to be addressed.  
> 
Exactly.  Do you think my proposal makes it more obvious that this is
what we want or less?  (Or is it just verbiage that people will skip
over because it's not part of a checklist?)

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20070409/cbeb184a/attachment.bin