[Fedora-packaging] Re: Statistics on usage of disttags in Fedora Core and Extras

[Axel Thimm]

On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 11:54:15AM +0200, Matthias Saou wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote :
> 
> > On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 02:06:52PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > On Friday 06 April 2007 13:52:12 Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > > > I would recommend at least one rebuild of a package just before release
> > > > though for everything but pure data packages.  I've been surprised by
> > > > what has changed and caused failures.
> > > 
> > > Continuous rebuilds are done, just not imported.  I think this is great, we 
> > > get the benefit without the churn.  Churning the entire package set without 
> > > reason is ridiculous and may do more harm than good.  See Matt D's 
> > > core/extras rebuild reports.
> > 
> > But nobody tests them. Only fatal build errors are probed that way.
> 
> IIRC this is not true : A rebuild is also considered "failed" if it
> creates packages with different requires or provides than the ones from
> the packages in the repository.

So, if the build generates the same sonames, it is already considered
run-time tested?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20070416/61d12f16/attachment.bin