[Fedora-packaging] Re: Second user/group handling draft

[Axel Thimm]

On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 04:47:28PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Axel Thimm (Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net) said: 
> > > No, you can't. No prereqs allowed that early in the transaction.
> > 
> > prereqs? I was thinking more in the line of %post scripts that create
> > a new passwd/group with the most current shipped uid/gid < 100 and
> > save over the >= 100 uid/gids.
> 
> You said 'have setup upgrade'. setup cannot have scriptlets (and this
> sort of thing is horribly ugly anyways.)

Well, what do you propose on how to deal with changes in passwd short
of requiring the user to run anaconda? Every age and a while there are
changes needed after all.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20070514/3f4c6c47/attachment.bin