[Fedora-packaging] Should /usr/share/aclocal be in filesystem?
Orion Poplawski
orion at cora.nwra.com
Thu Oct 25 19:02:11 UTC 2007
Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> Technically, we're not really changing our stance here.
>
> If all of the packages putting aclocal bits are -devel packages, then it
> should be ok to let automake own that directory, and have those -devel
> packages depend on automake. If we've got non-devel packages doing this,
> then we need to look into moving that directory ownership to something
> more universal, like filesystem.
It was a -devel package in question, so we'll have it require automake (
though it still rankles a little - the -devel package is easily used
without automake).
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion at cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
More information about the packaging
mailing list