[Fedora-packaging] Re: I wish to package some CC licensed content ...

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le vendredi 20 février 2009 à 13:14 -0600, Matthew Woehlke a écrit :

> I think Bill Nottingham really hit the nail on the head here with why 
> content should be a separate repo. It's generally unlikely to be tied to 
> a particular Fedora release, ergo putting it in a version-release repo 
> would lead to a lot of unnecessary duplication.

Because our packaging guidelines do not ever change, and rpm has
fossilized, right?

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20090220/d96c7ffc/attachment.bin