[Fedora-packaging] [Draft][RFC] The use of alternatives
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
dominik at greysector.net
Thu Feb 26 18:39:36 UTC 2009
On Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 20:03, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >>Hi all,
> >>Here's a draft that - after deciding which solution is best - should
> >>eventually be put into Packaging Guidelines:
> >>I tried to list all pros and cons of each solution.
> >>I'm personally hesitating between using %ghost or Provides:, but I'd
> >>prefer the Provides: solution.
> >If the only con of the %ghost solution is that it conflicts with "files
> >owned by multiple packages are forbidden"
> I would advocate the use of %ghost. It works, provided the contents of
> all the targets are the same, ie, if they all use:
> touch /far/bar
> Conflicts will arise to simply highlight pkgs not following the
> convention (ie, being a valuable debugging tool).
Sounds good to me.
Thanks for the comments. I'll incorporate them in the draft and present
it later for approval.
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
More information about the packaging