[Fedora-packaging] Review Guidelines missing entry

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le vendredi 12 juin 2009 à 10:32 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : 
> I just noticed that although checking for static libraries is listed on:
>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines
> 
> Checking for Bundled libraries isn't:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries
> 
> I'm going to add that as it's just a clarification rather than a change
> in Guidelines.  If someone objects, holler and I can revert until the
> next FPC meeting.

Since adding a line to check for fonts and apply corresponding
guidelines was refused on the ground that the review check list is
already too long, and reviewers should know packaging guidelines, I
object to this addition.

Please be consistent.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20090612/b3827de9/attachment.bin