[Fedora-packaging] Pre-review Gudelines

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Sat May 9 02:03:14 UTC 2009


On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 18:15 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Uh, why?  If the review process is broken surely there's a better way
> to address that than just saying that select packages just get to
> bypass it.
> 
> The only justification I can think of would be that the packages have
> to go in absolutely immediately.  But there was time for FESCo to meet
> about it, so that must not be the case.  I may not be doing many
> reviews lately and may be a bit behind on the reviews that I'm doing,
> but if someone pinged and say that they had an emergency and needed
> something reviewed right away, I'd do whatever I possibly could.

I'm told that in this case, the problem is getting packaging people to
fix up the packaging issues with the software, not the reviewer side.
The java team wished to move forward and get packages beat into shape as
they find issues building the whole mess together before they
concentrate on the packaging aspects of it.

The timing worked out in that Fernando asked me today about it, and a
FESCo meeting happened today.  They're trying to get work started on
Monday (in China no less).

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20090508/ae5ab62e/attachment.bin 


More information about the packaging mailing list