[Fedora-packaging] /etc/dbus-1/system.d/ files.

Kevin Fenzi kevin at tummy.com
Wed May 13 00:29:17 UTC 2009


Greetings. 

It's come up in the review of a package I have submitted that there is
no guideline for /etc/dbus-1/system.d/ files. 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437

My understanding is that these are not really config files. End users
should not be editing them. Many of the packages that have files in
there do not mark them as config. Some packages do. I suppose they
could be edited by end users, but I wouldn't think it would be very
common or desired. 

Should we have a guideline for them (or add to an existing one)?

Should the be marked config or not?

Should they not be under /etc/ at all?

Thoughts?

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20090512/a77e53e9/attachment.bin 


More information about the packaging mailing list