[Fedora-packaging] Inaccurate information about LiVES package

[salsaman]

Please answer the question. I have been personally assured by
representatives of the mplayer developers that the ffmpeg code contains *no
patented code*. I spent over two years fighting to convince the debian
developers that this was true, until they finally accepted it.

I am very tired of this discussion, and I am not prepared to go through it
all again with the fedora legal dept.

Please just point me to just one registered patent that the core of ffmpeg
is known to violate.
Otherwise you are just spreading FUD.


Salsaman.

http://lives.sourceforge.net
https://www.ohloh.net/accounts/salsaman



On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange at redhat.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:41:21AM -0300, salsaman wrote:
> > Please can you give an example of a patent which is violated in the
> *core*
> > of ffmpeg.
>
> This is the wrong place to raise legal questions wrt Fedora packaging, or
> potential new packages for Fedora. They should be directed to Fedora Legal
> team
>
>  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal
>
>  "If you have any legal questions that can be discussed in public,
>   post to fedora-legal-list . If you have any private legal questions
>   send a mail to legal AT fedoraproject.org"
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
> --
> |: Red Hat, Engineering, London    -o-
> http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
> |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o-
> http://deltacloud.org :|
> |: http://autobuild.org        -o-
> http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ <http://search.cpan.org/%7Edanberr/> :|
> |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505
> :|
> --
> packaging mailing list
> packaging at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20100601/022cfc37/attachment.html