[Fedora-packaging] Inaccurate information about LiVES package

[salsaman]

Yes, the live camera support will only be there if mjpegtools-devel is
present at build time. However, many distros build LiVES without this
feature (e.g. debian and ubuntu).

I'd not heard of rpmfusion before, but if it's acceptible to Harry then I
suggest we target builds for that instead of for for fedora itself.

This just leaves the issue of encoder_example for theora. In the absence of
a gst solution, may I suggest somebody (not me) contact the libtheora
packager and ask them to create a theora-bin package with just this binary ?


Regards,
Salsaman.


http://lives.sourceforge.net
https://www.ohloh.net/accounts/salsaman



On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2010/6/1 salsaman <salsaman at gmail.com>:
> > As I said, it's an optional build time dependency.
>
> But this is a build time only feature right?  We try to avoid shipping
> degraded functionality applications which have to be recompiled to get
> access to missing features.  Is the camera  inputs run time
> detectable? if not... this still be be destined for rpmfusion even
> with runtime detectable mplayer support.
>
> -jef
> --
> packaging mailing list
> packaging at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20100601/2a018534/attachment.html