[Fedora-packaging] FHS being ignored
Ralf Corsepius
rc040203 at freenet.de
Mon Jun 28 11:34:45 UTC 2010
On 06/23/2010 04:45 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius (rc040203 at freenet.de) said:
>>>> Another FHS violation has made it into Fedora:
>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606854
>>>
>>> Its a pseudo-filesystem, akin to /proc
>>
>> => /var/<somewhere>
>
> Won't work. /var can be a separate filesystem, cgroup filesystem
> may need to be available as boot.
Design flaw?
Who populates this directory?
Who uses it?
>> Also,
>> # rpm -qf /cgroup
>> libcgroup-0.35.1-1.fc13.x86_64
>> doesn't make sense.
>
> It could possibly be filesystem, I suppose. The original proposal
> was to add it in systemd just because it used it, which is obviously
> wrong.
>> This doesn't mean we have to "blindly swallow" further cases
>>
>> (We already have been ignorant about /selinux).
>
> I prefer 'not blindly adhering to a dogmatic standard', myself.
I prefer RH to learn not to continue ignoring estabished standards.
Ralf
More information about the packaging
mailing list