[Fedora-packaging] Packaging a postgresql cartridge

[Devrim GÜNDÜZ]

On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 11:54 +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> It seems we lack any guideline about packaging these, which is not
> that bad considering I could only find another cartridge in the repos,
> postigis.
> However, I'd like to hear your opinion about how to name the
> subpackage; I guess candidates would be:
> 
> 1- postgresql-rdkit
> 2- rdkit-postgresql
> 3- rdkit-pgsql
> 
> right now I'm leaning toward 1- given that I found many instances of
> 3-style packages providing optional pgsql support for "name" and 2- is
> not very different from 3-

Please use (2). 1 is used for PostgreSQL's core packages or core related
packages. 2nd one is used for extensions, which is appropriate for what
you say.

Your Upstream Packager,
-- 
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20100929/a285a5c9/attachment.bin