[Fedora-packaging] Mozilla Extension Guidelines

[Thomas Spura]

On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 23:33:02 +0200
Thomas Spura wrote:

> On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 12:34:47 -0400
> David Michael wrote:
> > Is it appropriate to support any/all applications listed in the
> > install.rdf, even if they are not available in Fedora?  (I don't
> > see a downside to this if the draft guidelines are followed, and it
> > would allow locally managed applications to take advantage of
> > extensions installed from RPMs.)
> 
> I would do so, if the applications are free and have a chance of
> beeing in fedora in the future (some extra symlinks don't need any
> relevant space).

Better support that applications, you want to support ;)
I haven't heard anything of "Fennec" or "E Music" till looking into the
install.rdf right now. I'll just support seamonkey and firefox till
there is a feature request for anything else...

Thanks,
  Tom