[Fedora-packaging] invalid soname question?

Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli at gmail.com
Thu Mar 31 13:20:36 UTC 2011


2011/3/31 Michael Schwendt:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:15:44 +1100, Guido wrote:
>
> So, it is planned to really hide this library (and its RPM dependenceis)
> in a future release?
>
> While the directory may be private (and outside run-time linker's search
> path), this is not true anymore after extending ld.so.conf. Plus, the
> library within that directory is treated like a public library instead of
> a private plugin (backend/module).
>
> Currently, as it seems, the tools and demos in %_libdir/MYGUI/ subdirs for
> Tools and Demos are linked with it and create a direct dependency on _any_
> libMyGUI.OgrePlatform.so found in ld.so's search path. I find this
> practice sort of questionable, since the library file name is unusual
> enough as to create a conflict in %_libdir and justify an own dir.

That's definitely true; as i said i tried to sort out things ahead of time,
and adding the ld.so.conf entry was the workaround, because unexpectedly
the tools and demos were linked directly to the wrapper library.

I regret if it is not acceptable; i will update the package moving the library
in _libdir (well just removing it from the old subdir as you found out its a
duplicate now), and renaming it with major version, asap.

Thanks for the hints
-- 
Guido Grazioli <guido.grazioli at gmail.com>
Via Parri 11 48011 - Alfonsine (RA)
Mobile: +39 347 1017202 (10-18)
Key FP = 7040 F398 0DED A737 7337  DAE1 12DC A698 5E81 2278
Linked in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/guidograzioli


More information about the packaging mailing list