[Fedora-packaging] ZendFramework a library which should not be bundled?

Dominic Hopf dmaphy at googlemail.com
Tue Nov 15 19:22:08 UTC 2011


Hi everyone,

I'm about to package Tine 2.0 (http://www.tine20.org/) and almost have a
package ready for review. One open issue I would like to clarify in
advance is, if I should consider the ZendFramework for PHP a library
which should not be bundled according to [1]?

At present the package is shipping it's own copy of the ZendFramework as
delivered with the original Tine 2.0 tarball, but I could remove that
and require the php-ZendFramework package instead.

Please let me know what you think about this.


Best Regards,
Dominic


[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries

-- 
Dominic Hopf 
http://dominichopf.de/

Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0  BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20111115/dc3b2f0d/attachment.bin 


More information about the packaging mailing list