[Fedora-packaging] Cannot cd to %{name}-%{version}

Kamal Ahmed kamal2222ahmed at yahoo.com
Thu Apr 12 18:57:06 UTC 2012


i found out the directory name "pcore" but outside of  rpm/spec
I wish there was a way inside the rpm , that i could find out the name of the directory that got created as a result of make
in any case. 


now i AM able to od a make, but when trying to copy the binaries ( lets say one of the binaries "ggsnc" in /usr/bin) i get error message on permission

ibcm_td.a ./libmt_td.a   -lpthread -lnsl -lrt -o ./hnbgw
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/kahmed/rpmbuild/BUILD/pcore/obj/hnbgw'
+ exit 0
Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.32400
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/kahmed/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd pcore
+ LANG=C
+ export LANG
+ unset DISPLAY
+ cp obj/ggsnc/ggsnc /usr/bin
cp: cannot create regular file `/usr/bin/ggsnc': Permission denied
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.32400 (%install)


RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.32400 (%install)

1. Am i doing the right thing which is to copy the binaries ( since we do NOT have a make install ) to /usr/bin
or this should be done in chroot 

2. i am copying binaries in %install section, is this ok ?

%install
cp obj/ggsnc/ggsnc %{_bindir}


Thanks,
-Kamal.




>________________________________
> From: zxq9 <zxq9 at zxq9.com>
>To: packaging at lists.fedoraproject.org 
>Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 11:00 AM
>Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Cannot cd to %{name}-%{version}
> 
>>2012/4/12 Kamal Ahmed <kamal2222ahmed at yahoo.com>:
>>>
>>> %prep
>>> mkdir %{name}-%{version}
>>
>>Find out what the directory is really called after extraction, i.e.
>>foo-somethingelse and change
>>
>>> %setup -q
>>
>>to
>>
>>%setup -qn foo-somethingelse
>
>Whatever the extraction directory is gets removed prior to the build to keep
>the space clean. So what he's saying is that your problem (isolated below)
>will stop happening if you name the build one something else.
>
>>> rpmbuild -bb pcore.spec
>
>Everything is fine here...
>
>>> Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.66518
>>> + umask 022
>>> + cd /home/kahmed/rpmbuild/BUILD
>>> + LANG=C
>>> + export LANG
>>> + unset DISPLAY
>>> + mkdir pcore-0.1
>
>And here the working directory is made based on the default extraction
>directory (that is, {% name %}-{% version %}).
>
>>> + cd /home/kahmed/rpmbuild/BUILD
>>> + rm -rf pcore-0.1
>
>And here it gets removed! So you need to name the one you really want to use
>something different, which is what Jon is saying about "setup -qn something-else".
>
>>> + /bin/gzip -dc /home/kahmed/rpmbuild/SOURCES/pcore-0.1.tar.gz
>>> + tar -xf -
>>> + STATUS=0
>>> + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
>>> + cd pcore-0.1
>
>And of course this step doesn't work because pcore-0.1 has already been
>"rm -rf"d
>
>>> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.66518: line 37: cd: pcore-0.1: No such file or directory
>
>Hope this makes more sense now. Packaging is a little mysterious until you
>play with it a bit on your own. And once you do, you'll find that Fedora
>has the best all-around guidelines for it, all told. They are strict and a
>little difficult to understand "why" at first, but there is a *lot* of
>experience expressed in the packaging guidelines, tutorials, rpm itself and
>this list (most of the time...).
>--
>packaging mailing list
>packaging at lists.fedoraproject.org
>https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20120412/bc2e11bb/attachment.html>


More information about the packaging mailing list