[Fedora-packaging] Provides for unversioned so files

[Rex Dieter]

On 08/22/2012 09:09 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>> "SO" == Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky at redhat.com> writes:
>
> SO> I came upon this when runnning fedora-review on this package. Now I
> SO> am wondering: Is this a packaging problem in bind-dyndb-ldap
> SO> (i.e. it has provides for private shared unversioned library) or is
> SO> it OK? The so file is outside ldpath so that's not an issue.
>
> I would definitely filter it

Or get rpm to autoprov only on ldpath'd items...

-- rex