[Fedora-packaging] Multiple file ownership allowed nowadays?

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On 01/30/2012 01:31 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 29.01.2012, 23:38 -0500 schrieb Jon Stanley:
>> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Christoph Wickert
>> <christoph.wickert at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I wonder if this rule is still needed. I know I'd loose backward
>>> compatibility with older rpm versions, but I don't want make a
>>
>> I agree that a -common subpackage is silly for this, but are any of
>> the RPM versions that this *wouldn't* work with still in supported
>> releases?
> 
> Not in Fedora.
> 
>> The only one I'd be concerned with is RHEL5, but I think even that
>> works right, no?
> 
> I haven't tested it, but based on my experience with multi-arch file
> conflicts I *guess* it will not work on RHEL 5.
> 
But RHEL 5 shouldn't really get gtk3 packages anyway, right?

Regards,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/

Email:  salimma at fedoraproject.org  | GPG key ID: A36A937A
Jabber: hircus at jabber.ccc.de       | IRC: hircus at irc.freenode.net

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments