[Fedora-packaging] version-release for different branches

[Tom Lane]

Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky at redhat.com> writes:
> What some people don't like is that F16/17 git history will contain
> mention of F18 mass rebuild, but that is (again IMO) a very minor
> "issue".

FWIW, I beg to differ.  There is no problem at all if you skip over
release number 3 in some branch, but having a specfile changelog that
lies about what happened in that branch is a bad idea.  It'll lead to
confusion later.

			regards, tom lane