[Fedora-packaging] How to deal with the porn part of a package?

Petr Ĺ abata contyk at redhat.com
Tue Jul 9 09:02:27 UTC 2013

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:15:11AM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> [100% personal opinion here...]

+1 to everything here.

The package doesn't ship with any pornographic content and
nobody is forcing its users to actually download anything from
those sites.

I'd also like to point out there are (possibly many) other
packages with very similar 'issues', notably libquvi-scripts
or gnaughty.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20130709/dcc0e5e8/attachment.sig>

More information about the packaging mailing list