[Fedora-packaging] Conflicts when data is moved to a sub-package
opensource at till.name
Thu Jul 18 20:50:10 UTC 2013
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:29:58AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:51:49AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > dvb-apps will (at least on current Fedora releases, maybe not on
> > Rawhide) require dtv-scan-tables but there is no need for
> > dtv-scan-tables to require dvb-apps afaics.
> Conflicts: dvb-apps <= NEVR_OF_PACKAGE_BEFORE_SPLIT
> would not violate the spirit of the guideline. The guideline was written
> so that people could always install the latest packages from the repo
> regardless of what other packages they have installed. Having the version
> in the conflicts allows that to continue to be the case.
IMHO the spirit should be mentioned more explicit to make understanding
the reason for the guidelines better:
> I thought that the Optional feature portion of the guideline would cover
> this explicitly but it looks like it doesn't. The FPC should probably add
> this as another case where (versioned) conflicts are acceptable so that that
> is clear.
> If you'd like to open a ticket, that can be done.
I created a draft:
More information about the packaging